“Stand by as we monitor the maturation of 3D. And when we get there, we’ll look back and say it grew too fast.”
Marty Shindler, The Shindler Perspective
At several industry conferences, including CES, Digital Hollywood and Variety’s 3D Summit, where I have moderated panels on 3D, I have been asked how I would characterize the maturity level of the modern era of 3D. The short answer: It is maturing, but how that is arrived at requires a review of what has transpired in the past several years.
Modern 3D began in November 2005 with the release of Chicken Little. It was a bold move at the time by Disney, Dolby and RealD, but most innovations tend to be that way.
All three companies fared well with the risk they took. The two projection companies, RealD and Dolby, have staked out competitive shares in the industry with their respective technologies. Disney has a significant presence in both the number and quality of 3D movies. Their ESPN sister company has been a leader in bringing sporting events to the market, even before there was much of a market in terms of the installed base of 3D TVs.
Many others have joined the fiercely competitive industry since. Some have won, some have not, and there are many whose success is still to be determined. They range from the other major studios and independents to other 3D broadcast networks, exclusively or on an existing net, and a full complement of equipment providers at all points on the value chain.
Many industries go through various types of growth curves, from start up and nascent to growing and on to maturing and to mature. It is no different for modern stereoscopic cinema.
There are many analogies to be drawn between CGI and stereoscopic 3D, as well as from the introduction of color, sound and other new technologies that have impacted the movie and TV production, distribution (including home entertainment) and exhibition industry segments. (See my article Frenzy in the Third Dimension).
During the various cycles, different companies and technologies enter the picture, so to speak. The supply chain and its related sophistication, or lack thereof at times, involves a wide range of companies, each attempting to eke out a slice of the market for its product or service.
At different times and for different companies or combinations, there are different business models in place at the earliest stages, sometimes to seed the market in order to promote faster growth.
So, what constitutes maturing or maturity? Are we there yet? How will we know when we arrive? Is the answer market penetration, technology sophistication, content ubiquity or even market acceptance?
Market acceptance seems to be a given at this time. 3D movies have achieved enormous success, certainly on a macro basis, with some movies doing very well and others, not so well, but no matter what, the public is generally aware of the product.
Newspaper ads for 3D movies used to include “also available in 2D.” Apparently that was too confusing for some as we recently saw an ad in the LA Times that indicated “available in non 3D.” If 3D has become the default, that is an indication of its progress along the industry’s maturity continuum.
The theatrical exhibition industry is still the driver for all other release windows. Digital cinema is inextricably tied to the growth of 3D stereoscopic cinema. By some accounts, 3D is and has been the primary reason for theaters to convert. At this writing, 3D comprises some 65%++ of total digital cinema deployments. By this standard, on a global basis, we have not yet reached a saturation point. There are still times when there are not enough 3D theater screens available for all of the 3D releases to get sufficient time at the theaters before being relegated to a 2D screen when new 3D releases force the rotation. That is diminishing as studios are better able to gauge the competition and their respective release schedules.
This year’s CES and NAB showcased, once again, the sophistication level of equipment, of various industry companies from the very large and most compelling demonstration of 3ality Technica, as well as others, in various industry segments, from hardware to software and, of course, production services.
We are seeing more and more content being created and the industry has for the last 9 – 12 months spawned several start ups and the continued growth of made for TV content by the established players, all hoping that in due time there will be a sufficient installed base of 3D TVs. From the early days of TV, movies and sporting events were primary drivers. The same held true when color was introduced and again when HD came into the market. Prices for the 3D TVs have been dropping, so before too long the non-early adopter will enter and help to grow the market. It will signal a part of the replacement cycle for TVs, much the way that it occurred in the prior introductions of color and HD.
The cycle will speed up when the general public becomes more aware of 3D TV events. The Superbowl in 3D will help, when/if that occurs. However, just as “also available in HD” was inserted at the bottom of the screen at the start of TV shows, a similar “available in 3D” will push the process along, even if it is subliminal at first. But first, more 3D TV content must be produced for prime time.As the maturation process continues, we will see a bigger and more sophisticated industry. There will also be changing business models as traditional industry economics take hold, e.g. most movies lose money and most TV shows only last for a few years. Companies that seeded the marketplace amidst lower pricing, sometimes at or below cost, will find that not sustainable. In fact, that is a very clear lesson learned from the CGI rollout in the 90s.
So, that raises the question again, where are we on the growth curve for 3D? The industry is well on the way to maturity. It is not in its adolescent phase generally speaking and is well into maturing.
Stand by as we monitor the maturation. And when we get there, we’ll look back and say it grew too fast.
|Marty Shindler wearing RealD glasses|
Marty Shindler is CEO of The Shindler Perspective, Inc. a husband and wife consulting practice with a pedigree that includes a Big 4 firm and a top 5 business school, with additional experience at 20th Century Fox, MGM, Lucasfilm/Industrial Light & Magic and Kodak’s Cinesite.
Marty may be reached at Marty@iShindler.com.
Related stories from InPark & partner blogs:
Aug 28, 2017 0
Jul 31, 2017 0We put on our themed entertainment goggles and plunged into...
Jun 12, 2017 0Ultimately, for a park to be successful, it must analyze...
Apr 17, 2017 0“Working in the industry can be dysfunctional at times,...
Jan 27, 2017 0Welcome back to the Five Spot, where we ask industry...
Dec 27, 2016 0InPark's Joe Kleiman tried out the latest incarnation of...
Sep 23, 2016 0Falcon's Creative Group, an Orlando-based creative services...